Introduction:
Like in Israel, Britain is the one of the most democratic countries in the world that doesn't have a written constitution, but she has a long legacy of protecting civil rights and it isn't shown in a written document.
For many years, England struggled to maintain human rights without influence on any higher court outside England.
England was one of the first to sign the human rights act, during 2000 there was a significant change, with the entrance of the "the human rights act" law that brought into u.k.
Today citizens in Britain have a "range of civil rights" written and settled. Several main articles who brought to the u.k law dealt with the right to counsel, right to remain silence, right from protection during police investigation.
 The new law doesn't have a constitutional status and it doesn't give the court the privilege to denied parliament law. But he refers a new authorities and the possibility to recommend the parliament to re-check the law. Reality shows that those recommendations seem as obligated. Farther on the new reform gave the British citizen the possibility to get assistance from local court instead of the Strasbourg European court. We always believed that human rights are "cogent" and part of the court system, but when we look inside the right we discover that those rights doesn't always brought to the suspect.
in our assignment below we will research the development of the "criminals offence" right in u.k during the years and compare it to the situation in Israel.